Three Feature Buckets

Use it when you're drowning in feature ideas and need a clear, consensus-driven way to prioritize must-haves, metric movers, and wow factors.

What is it?

Three Feature Buckets is a feature prioritization framework pioneered by Adam Nash that helps product teams tame chaotic roadmaps and obsessively align on impact.

It tackles the universal problem of endless feature requests, internal debates, and scope creep by forcing every idea into one of three purpose-driven categories: “Now” features for critical fixes and blockers, “Performance” features to drive key metrics like activation, retention, or revenue, and “Delighters” to surprise, engage, and differentiate your product. By explicitly labeling each prospective deliverable, you instantly cut through the backlog noise, present a data-driven roadmap to stakeholders, and maintain a balanced investment across urgent needs, growth drivers, and long-term hooks.

Whether you're optimizing an onboarding flow, iterating on conversion experiments, or prototyping micro-interactions, Three Feature Buckets gives you a no-fluff structure for prioritization, and you can stand up the framework in under a day.

Why it matters?

By cutting through prioritization noise and aligning every team around a shared set of criteria, Three Feature Buckets accelerates decision-making, focuses engineering on the highest-leverage work, and prevents shiny-object syndrome. The result: faster time-to-market for critical fixes, systematic metric gains from performance experiments, and ongoing surprise-and-delight moments that boost retention and referrals.

How it works

Growth co-pilot turns your toughest product questions into clear, data-backed recommendations you can act on immediately.

Gather and list all feature ideas

Consolidate inputs from customer feedback, analytics, sales requests, and internal brainstorms into a single backlog to ensure nothing gets overlooked.

Define your buckets

Label three columns, Now (urgent must-haves), Performance (metric-moving initiatives), and Delighters (surprise-and-woo features). Use concrete criteria for each to remove ambiguity.

Classify each feature

Debate as a cross-functional team and assign every item to one bucket only. If you can't justify why it belongs, it probably doesn't.

Allocate capacity

Decide the percentage of your next sprint or quarter dedicated to each bucket, e.g., 50% Now, 30% Performance, 20% Delighters, to keep your roadmap balanced and aligned.

Review and iterate

At each planning cadence, revisit buckets, reassign as context changes, and adjust allocations based on real performance data and stakeholder feedback.

Frequently asked questions

Growth co-pilot turns your toughest product questions into clear, data-backed recommendations you can act on immediately.

What exactly are the three feature buckets?

The three buckets are Now (urgent fixes and blockers), Performance (initiatives that move your key metrics), and Delighters (features that surprise and engage users). Every proposed feature must fit into one, and only one, bucket.

What exactly are the three feature buckets?

How do I decide if something is a Performance feature or a Delighter?

Performance features tie directly to measurable goals, think A/B tests on signup flows or pricing experiments. Delighters, by contrast, add unexpected polish or “wow” factors without immediate KPI uplift, like micro-animations or easter eggs.

How do I decide if something is a Performance feature or a Delighter?

Can a feature move between buckets over time?

Yes. A Delighter can become Performance if data shows it drives retention, or a Performance feature might become a Now item if it uncovers critical bugs. Reassign at each planning cycle based on fresh insights.

Can a feature move between buckets over time?

How do I balance my team's capacity across the three buckets?

Start with a rule of thumb, like 50% Now, 30% Performance, 20% Delighters, and adjust based on business stage. Early-stage products may need more Now work; mature products lean into Performance and Delighters.

How do I balance my team's capacity across the three buckets?

Is Three Feature Buckets enough on its own for prioritization?

It provides clear, fast alignment, but pairing it with data-driven frameworks, like ICE scoring for Performance ideas, gives you extra rigor. Always validate assumptions with customer feedback and analytics.

Is Three Feature Buckets enough on its own for prioritization?

You've bucketed your features into Now, Performance, and Delighters, now don't launch blind: feed that prioritized list into the CrackGrowth diagnostic to expose hidden UX friction and ramp up conversion from day one.

Get started for free